On the Press and the People

Witnessing what continues to unfold this past week concerning the IRS targeting conservative groups combined with the Administration’s “policy” of dismissiveness and denial, it is important to remember on whose “watch” all of these actions have taken place: the Associated Press.

It was Coolidge, writing his column for October 18, 1930, who said, “Like everything else, the standards of the press are ultimately set by the people themselves. They will get what they insist on having. If they want a reliable, serious, informing newspaper, it will be furnished for them. If they are content with exciting, highly colored sensationalism, they will get that. The present tendency is toward higher standards.” One wishes the AP would take an ounce of this advice now. As, however, they have persisted in their effusion for partisan outcomes without concern for factual (or actual) journalism, a new media has risen from the people themselves. As the old media struggles to keep subscribers and audiences, the new continues to rally toward truth and a responsible press.

The substance of Mr. Coolidge’s point is that if we tolerate aberrant “reporting,” we will continue to get it. The reverse is equally true. Coolidge’s prediction is now fulfilling itself: we are getting the facts we demand. It was Andrew Breitbart who reminded us in September 2011 that we, regular Americans, are the journalists now. We are doing the job the media simply won’t do. I think Mr. Coolidge would be proud.

                                  Image

                         Image

On “The Press Under a Free Government”

“The relationship between governments and the press has always been recognized as a matter of large importance. Wherever despotism abounds, the sources of public information are the first to be brought under its control. Wherever the cause of liberty is making its way, one of its highest accomplishments is the guarantee of the freedom of the press. It has always been realized, sometimes instinctively, oftentimes expressly, that truth and freedom are inseparable. An absolutism could never rest upon anything save a perverted and distorted view of human relationships and upon false standards set up and maintained by force. It has always found it necessary to attempt to dominate the entire field of education and instruction. It has thrived on ignorance. While it has sought to train the minds of a few, it has been largely with the purpose of attempting to give them a superior facility for misleading the many. Men have been educated under absolutism, not that they might bear witness to the truth, but that they might be the more ingenious advocates and defenders of false standards and hollow pretenses. This has always been the method of privilege, the method of class and caste, the method of master and slave”Calvin Coolidge, addressing the American Society of Newspaper Editors, January 17, 1925. The full speech can be found in “Foundations of the Republic,” pp.183-190 or online at http://teachingamericanhistory.org/library/document/the-press-under-a-free-government/.

On Reuniting the States

On Reuniting the States

Return of the Confederate battle flags to Virginia, North Carolina and Texas on December 16, 1927. An earlier attempt by President Cleveland in 1887 met with successful opposition by the Grand Army of the Republic (Union veterans) as “trophies” of the War that should not be returned. It would be “treasonous” according to the large body of obstinate veterans.

President Theodore Roosevelt, through a careful coordination with Congress, restored a partial collection of battle flags to the Southern states in 1905, taking them from storage by the War Department in Washington.

Like so many old wounds, however, President Coolidge did not evade the controversy for fear that it would cost political support. Coolidge upheld just dealings toward all, whether it was the full citizenship for all tribes or fair honor due Southern Americans who fought just as valiantly as the Yankees did for principled reasons. It was overdue time to lay aside hostility, heal old grievances, and reestablish peace between Americans, North and South.

He recognized his duty included leadership by example to help reunite the country around the essentials we share as Americans. It would not be right to misuse a President’s influence by keeping us divided and at war with one another. He was as much an advocate of peace at home as he was abroad.