On Getting to the Point

Calvin Coolidge was known for his incredible ability to distill the clutter of requests, technical details and verbose discussions into their essential qualities. His succinct style and disciplined pursuit of a matter’s basic point may have appeared lazy to the workaholic but to the one paying attention, it was a product of his practiced skills as a good listener and an effectual doer outside the limelight. Coolidge’s mastery of bringing the complex back down to its simplest principles left more than one contemporary amazed. Henry Stoddard, the owner and editor of the New York Evening Mail and student of Presidents from Grant through Coolidge and beyond had this instructive assessment of the man, writing in 1938:

“I doubt whether we have ever had a President–certainly not one in my time–who could probe so quickly and so surely to the heart of a problem as Calvin Coolidge did. He frequently said that if you got to the common sense of a question you had its answer–but how few possess that rare gift of seeking or even getting to the common sense of a question! In the lengthy debates in Congress how often have you heard common sense revealed? He insisted that worries beclouded clear thinking; therefore he refused to have them. No one would say that he was an optimist–he was too much of a realist–but his realism was of faith, not of fear. He never dreaded tomorrow. He prepared for it. No man having the right to know ever left Coolidge with the slightest doubt of his opinions…Slow to give his word, he never called it back” (‘It Costs to be President,’ p.133).

                 Image

Former President Coolidge at Madison Square Garden, his last public appearance, October 11, 1932. As he rose to speak, the crowds began to eat so much of his time with their enthusiastic standing ovations that he held up his watch to remind them that minutes were precious and he had to get to the point quickly in the time allotted. Even then, his determination to cut through the waste and get to the substance of why he was there mattered more than the accolades.

On “The Press Under a Free Government”

“The relationship between governments and the press has always been recognized as a matter of large importance. Wherever despotism abounds, the sources of public information are the first to be brought under its control. Wherever the cause of liberty is making its way, one of its highest accomplishments is the guarantee of the freedom of the press. It has always been realized, sometimes instinctively, oftentimes expressly, that truth and freedom are inseparable. An absolutism could never rest upon anything save a perverted and distorted view of human relationships and upon false standards set up and maintained by force. It has always found it necessary to attempt to dominate the entire field of education and instruction. It has thrived on ignorance. While it has sought to train the minds of a few, it has been largely with the purpose of attempting to give them a superior facility for misleading the many. Men have been educated under absolutism, not that they might bear witness to the truth, but that they might be the more ingenious advocates and defenders of false standards and hollow pretenses. This has always been the method of privilege, the method of class and caste, the method of master and slave”Calvin Coolidge, addressing the American Society of Newspaper Editors, January 17, 1925. The full speech can be found in “Foundations of the Republic,” pp.183-190 or online at http://teachingamericanhistory.org/library/document/the-press-under-a-free-government/.

Calvin Coolidge and Civil Rights—the Rest of the Story

Calvin Coolidge and Civil Rights—the Rest of the Story

Here is a great recap by David Pietrusza of what has gone unreported and even suppressed about Coolidge’s brave convictions on civil rights. Notice that in what is commonly perceived to be a past mired in racism (contrary to these “enlightened times”) Americans of all backgrounds were running for office, owning their own successful businesses, finding opportunity and realizing the potential of America’s ideals decades before the Civil Rights Act of 1964. Considering the past fifty years especially, have the benefits really outweighed the costs of government’s social experimentation? “Coolidge Prosperity” alone, aside from the leadership Coolidge demonstrated in the ways Mr. Pietrusza notes, did more for race relations than any of the “Great Society’s” loftiest promises.

CalvinCoolidgeNI